Pride seems even from its name to be concerned with great things; what sort of great things, is the first question we must try to answer. It makes no difference whether we consider the state of character or the man characterized by it. Now the man is thought to be proud who thinks himself worthy of great things, being worthy of them; for he who does so beyond his deserts is a fool, but no virtuous man is foolish or silly. The proud man, then, is the man we have described. For he who is worthy of little and thinks himself worthy of little is temperate, but not proud; for pride implies greatness, as beauty implies a goodsized body, and little people may be neat and well-proportioned but cannot be beautiful. On the other hand, he who thinks himself worthy of great things, being unworthy of them, is vain; though not every one who thinks himself worthy of more than he really is worthy of in vain. The man who thinks himself worthy of worthy of less than he is really worthy of is unduly humble, whether his deserts be great or moderate, or his deserts be small but his claims yet smaller. And the man whose deserts are great would seem most unduly humble; for what would he have done if they had been less? The proud man, then, is an extreme in respect of the greatness of his claims, but a mean in respect of the rightness of them; for he claims what is accordance with his merits, while the others go to excess or fall short.
-Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics
Crashing waves on the timeless sand
Makes you wonder what kind of man
Could stand up to the sea
And on it set sail
Could pilot a boat
That's destined to fail
Out over the water
Between the sea and the sky
Knowing that the boat will sink
And that he will die
--Don Loper
6 comments:
i didn't know you read aristotle. i lvoe nichomachean ethics. i like what he has to say in there about the good.
Oh yes, "the good," never clearly defined, never clearly delineated, but the ultimate end of all existence. Words without music. Sigh.
words without music is great!(so too is music without words)
i invite you to submit to me your definition of 'good' (or your preferred analog) that is cleraly defined and clearly delineated.
-brady
words without music ARE great, that is.
I cannot define the good, so I do not discuss the good. Others should follow that lead.
Jacob 4:12, 2 Ne 25:26- applicable?
Post a Comment